The Final Week of The Season

The last week, for some of us it begins the forming of a true brotherhood where fans, players, and cities alike come together under the banner of the Stanley Cup Playoffs. After having a team eliminated from contention some fans walk away until the Draft comes up in June while others look for a hot team to follow in the playoffs to try and rally behind as an undergod..of course your their happiness and not our own. The final group lies in those just wanting to watch excellent hockey played over two months while ripping on any mishaps they stumble up along the way. Hey if our regular seasons gave us drinking problems then it is only fair we include you in our misery. Before this begins next week April 11th we still have a mess of standings, teams, and matchups to analyze.

Western Conference
As of right not getting into specific matchups is a bit premature because they change rapidly overnight. Rather, it would be more beneficial to see what the remaining teams must do to afford themselves a playoff fate.

-Vancouver Canucks = locked down in the 1 or 2 seeds and fighting for the Presidents Trophy with New York (and maybe the Blues). The Canucks must gain a higher point total as they cannot catch the ROW stat category as a tie breaker. Ending the year on a back to back with Calgary/Edmonton is not a difficult schedule but both teams will want to hurt their divisional foe in any way they can, possibly costing them the first seeding.

-St. Louis Blues = The Blues have a busy rest of the week with games against Detroit, possible first round opponent Phoenix, and scuffling Dallas. Those are all winnable and it will be interesting to see what their compete level is during the week and more importantly how their play affects the standings of the lower seeds.

-LA Kings = These guys are in trouble but control their own destiny. Carter is out with an apparent deep bone bruise on his ankle and they will need him sooner than well, later might be training camp. Home and home against San Jose to end the year and likely decide who takes 3rd overall in the West. LA wins out and they are golden, they lose out and either miss the playoffs entirely or get a dangerously low seed.

-Nashville Predators = Nice position for them, overtook 4th place tonight and have an easy schedule this week with DAL/COL. Both teams are fighting for their lives but neither poses much of a threat to Nashville on their game.

-Detroit Red Wings = Wings are 1 point back on Nashville but have one game in hand. They also have a tougher final schedule of the Blues, Devils, and Blackhawks which leads me to think they finish 5th

-Chicago Blackhawks = Could sneak into a higher seed than 6th with a favorable matchup with the Wild and an always tough game against Detroit. Their fate may already be set however, merely awaiting that 3rd seed opponent.

-Phoenix Coyotes= They could climb all the way up to third if they and San Jose sweep their games this week, they could still fall shy of the playoffs

-San Jose Sharks = Speaking of SJ, if they lose out to LA and remain at 92 points, Colorado winning out would have them jump them in the standings (max 92 points, but higher ROW for Avs.)

Outsiders: For Dallas and similar to the Avs, winning out (despite giving points away to the Sharks tonight) puts them at 93 points, this allows for SJ to get 1 point out of 4 possible and the Avs can knock them (SJ) out. Phoenix is a little safer from Dallas, only needing 1 point to make the playoffs. The Avs can only catch the 8 seed at 92 points and that itself looks slim.

NHL GM Meetings provide about zero surprises, roughly infinite potential for jokes

The first day of the newly annual GM meetings went down today. And about nothing that should surprise any NHL fan actually happened. But I felt obligated to write about it, so sit down and shut up.

Several GMs were on board with the return of the red line, and thereby the 2 line pass. A lot of the managers believe that this would essentially slow down the game, and make it safer. Most of the GMs have expressed that rules like Rule 48 and Rule 41 are as far as the NHL can go to remove concussions "on site," so to speak. The general consensus was that the only way to change the concussion problem is to fundamentally alter the game. A sentiment that has been brought about by the likes of Don Cherry since roughly the day after concussions became an issue.

There is something to be said about a GM who believes that things should not change due to the limited entertainment value of a game with the 2-line pass rule. I understand fully that the game would be slower, but I would gladly rather watch a slower game with the leagues best players. In a league where there is already a call to contract the league because players who barely deserve to have a guaranteed spot in the AHL becoming regular NHL players, an environment where the best player in the game can miss almost 2 years from a head injury, I see very little legitimacy in the 'entertainment' factor. Slow the game down and give me Sidney Crosby. I will take this trade any day of the week.

Oh, there's also that sorta "messed up" part about refusing to change a needlessly dangerous sport for entertainment value.

On this subject, there was certainly something to be said about Brendan Shanahan's presentation about rule changes in representation of the Department of Player Safety. It was a video presentation. So essentially, as any hockey fans know, if that video was longer than 4 minutes, that coffee machine got a workout.

There were a few more rule changes proposed. Most of which were pretty simple and have been discussed publicly before. The hybrid icing that has been adapted by many leagues was brought up, and finally has some massive support. My guess is that since the USHL and NCAA have adapted it, the way it actually looks has become more visible to North American scouts and GMs. Of course, Brian Burke was happy to see it so accepted, since he has brought it up for the last 5 meetings. If the rule is adapted it would mark a momentous achievement.

It would be the first time Brian Burke has made anything better in 5 years.

The basic idea of hybrid icing is that the race to the puck can be cancelled by the linesman if he believes that the race will be clearly won by the team that was iced against. The "finish line" can either be an imaginary (or real?) line across the tops of the circles, or the dots. Either really works for me. I advocated this rule change when the CCHA was considering it, and am glad to see it. Races to the pucks on icing calls are a dangerous part of the sport that can be changed without fundamentally changing the sport.

There was also a proposal to remove the rule to allow hand-passes in the defensive zone.

Yes please, this rule prevents scoring, and changing it won't put any players in danger, and on two thirds of the ice this action is already illegal, so just get rid of it.

Vancouver GM Mike Gillis thought it was important to complain about officiating in the Stanley Cup Finals, where his team went 2-31. Also his team had more powerplays than the other team. Maybe if Mike Gillis wants to complain about how the powerplay situation is going, perhaps he should talk to his players, instead of other GMs about the officiating.

Also, Kenny Holland of Detroit brought up the idea of a 3 on 3 overtime after the 4 on 4 overtime period, but before the shootout. Mike Gillis of Vancouver supported it. Gee, what an odd couple of GMs to support a wide open, skill based mockery of hockey with six skaters on the ice.

In closing, most hockey fans saw this coming, Gillis complains about officials, he and Holland ask for a more skill based ending to a game (though Holland might have upped his support of the shootout this year), hybrid icing gets some support and concussions dominated the conversation.

See you tomorrow, hopefully with some actual news.